2 ms·
I'm not an attorney. If this has become a question of legal interpretation I'll have to excuse myself. I would be very surprised if IP law was the only possibl
by kristopolous 5y ago
I'm not an attorney. If this has become a question of legal interpretation I'll have to excuse myself.
I would be very surprised if IP law was the only possible legal wall in such a bad faith action as the one you're referring to but I'm completely unqualified to argue any actual legal nuance. Sorry.
What I really want is easier access to historical primary source research material without having to drive an hour and spend all day combining through microfiche. It feels stupid having to still do that in the 2020s. These should have been fed through a digitizer 20 years ago, it'd take like a weekend. It's not hard. The IP boogeyman is the only thing holding this up.
Heck, sometimes, say with various local LA city paper, there's often only 2 existent copies, one in Downey or Lapl central and one in Sacramento. When I get that role I literally have half the world's copies in my hand. I mean really, what the hell is that? Disk space is effectively free. Let's get on this.
I wish you luck on your book
- mcguire 5y agoI feel your frustration. But I don't think removing IP law entirely is the right answer.
- kristopolous 5y agoIntent has to be somewhere in there. If someone took a rare out of print book and after a good faith search for the copyright holder, started printing it and set aside the proceeds in escrow to go to the owner if they were found or donated otherwise, that's materially very different from stealing works in print and price sniping them.