4 ms·
I believe with shortening them to eg. 1 year or two. You still have enough time to break into the market, to establish your position, on the other hand it stops
by ajsnigrutin 5y ago
I believe with shortening them to eg. 1 year or two. You still have enough time to break into the market, to establish your position, on the other hand it stops the patenting of "useless" crap (eg, page-down moving one full page (and not screen) down), because patents cost money, and if your invention isn't something revolutionary, it's not worth patenting it for such a short timeframe.
- tablespoon 5y ago> I believe with shortening them to eg. 1 year or two. You still have enough time to break into the market, to establish your position I don't think that's enough time to do either of those things, even in the most wildly optimistic circumstances. Honestly a patent term probably should be at least 10 years for an actual invention, but they need to tighten up rules about what an invention actually is. The place where IP has really gone off the rails is copyright.
- infogulch 5y agoI guess just resetting copyright back to 20 years and patents to 10 would be a huge benefit. Maybe give software patents 5 years.