3 ms·
>> "it still isn't an example of a patent used for good" What do you mean by good, then? It has generated lots of cash for Google and thus provided lots of job
by gerickson 15y ago
>> "it still isn't an example of a patent used for good"
What do you mean by good, then? It has generated lots of cash for Google and thus provided lots of jobs.
- scotty79 15y agoIt would still generate and provide the same even if it was not patented. Unless you believe that it was Google patent on page rank algorithm that prevented all other companies to get better at doing search.
- stickfigure 15y agoPatents are always good for the patent holder. The question is whether or not the patent is good for society, and justifies the patent enterprise in the first place. To this, the only major point of consideration should be: Without patent protection, would this technology have been developed anyways? For the vast majority of patented software, the answer is yes. Probably including pagerank and mp3. The patent process brings no value to society and therefore shouldn't be enforced by society. In the case of drug discovery & development, the answer clearly different. Patents make sense.