3 ms·
It seems unconstitutional to me; you have no expectation of privacy when you’re out in public, and badge numbers are legally required to be worn. This combinat
by ashtonkem 5y ago
It seems unconstitutional to me; you have no expectation of privacy when you’re out in public, and badge numbers are legally required to be worn.
This combination in effect turns into a requirement to either not film, or not post videos of cops, which is unconstitutional.
- dvt 5y ago> not post videos of cops, which is unconstitutional Just to be clear, you're not allowed to post videos of plenty of things (Area-51, a meeting between the Joint Chiefs, closed sessions in Congress, etc.). But you're right that you're allowed to record videos of cops in public[1]. I think the law in question is about personally-identifiable information. [1] https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1578557.html https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1578557.html
- perihelions 5y agoIt's perfectly legal to post videos of any of those things.
- munk-a 5y agoIt is illegal to post a whole lot of videos you might find pretty innocuous. A not insignificant portion of America has two party consent laws[1] that really restrict what you're able to record when it comes to private individuals. It has been pretty clearly decided highlighted that police do not enjoy this commonly held right[2] due to the sensitivity of their role but I really don't know if that same restriction extends to other public offices when acting in a non-public manner (i.e. the JCS) - I am really not familiar with the specific exceptions the above comment laid out so I won't comment on them... but it is illegal to post a whole bunch of different sorts of videos. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#Two-party_consent_states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#... 2. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/06/you-have-first-amendment-right-record-police https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/06/you-have-first-amendme...
- ashtonkem 5y agoIt’s illegal to record without consent in some states. Posting such a recording is problematic because it’s evidence of a crime, not a crime in and of itself. If it were, there would be cases of journalists posting transcripts from illegally recorded conversations, which isn’t happening.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]