>Stuff like this would rapidly ruin wikipedia. No not really. That is a straw man. Unless the community consensus was that Sanger really was a turnip the edit

>Stuff like this would rapidly ruin wikipedia. No not really. That is a straw man. Unless the community consensus was that Sanger really was a turnip the edit would not stand. If wikipedia is not going to be neutral why bother reaading it at all. Plenty of sources exist already that will tell you what to think. I think neutrality is more important even than "factual" accuracy.