> 2 people run for office, both committed a crime. 1 of them supports Russia in their ongoing aggression. This is simply not supported by the policies enacted

> 2 people run for office, both committed a crime. 1 of them supports Russia in their ongoing aggression. This is simply not supported by the policies enacted during by the Trump Administration: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/09/25/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions-on-russia/ https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/09/25/o... > So Russia has WikiLeaks post only the information on the candidate they don't like, securing the election for a politically favorable but perhaps even more corrupt person. There are three answers for that: If Wikileaks has a bias than it can easily explained by the fact that Assange's woes were caused by the Obama admistration. And even if they didn't have a bias, most of their staff at Wikileaks do not speak Russian and they try to verify every piece they publish; as opposed to making claims based on partisan funded opposition research. It's also far harder to leak from Russia and other authoritarian/mafious states and also because their intelligence agencies use mechanical typewriters.