7 ms·
If you're saying they are unreliable as source, the onus is on you to say why. You just posed some questions without actually stating anything, made an assumpti
by sweetheart 5y ago
If you're saying they are unreliable as source, the onus is on you to say why. You just posed some questions without actually stating anything, made an assumption with no evidence ("Certainly not someone who is dispassionately interested in promoting human health", "It’s mostly vegans, seventh day adventists, and other dietary-religious groups.")
So, do you actually have any sources on why we shouldn't trust them?
- wyager 5y agoThis is an HN comment thread, not a scientific paper. There’s no “onus” on me to do anything, and if there were, it certainly wouldn’t be up to you who got to make comments without fulfilling some evidentiary ritual. If you’re actually interested, you could very easily google it, but I’ll give you a starting point: https://www.nutritioncoalition.us/news/2020-dietary-guidelines-committee https://www.nutritioncoalition.us/news/2020-dietary-guidelin...