From the fourth paragraph in the article from “ivfbabble” linked at the top of the article: “Those at the forefront of science around childbirth still face maj

From the fourth paragraph in the article from “ivfbabble” linked at the top of the article: “Those at the forefront of science around childbirth still face major ethical questions and arguments. We do not seem to have learned to trust our scientists.” An author should not be asking the public to trust scientists. Scientific results should stand on their own or not at all. For what it’s worth, the very existence of the author (and by extension, the article) shows that IVF meets this criteria. Sorry for the soapbox, but I’ll still show up the next time anybody suggests I should “trust science” or even worse, uses the term “settled science”. Both terms are fundamentally incompatible with the scientific method.