2 ms·
Yes, and someone who's followed the case pretty closely agrees with you: > Except, Siggi retracts nothing substantive that is alleged in the indictment, so thi
by roywiggins 5y ago
Yes, and someone who's followed the case pretty closely agrees with you:
> Except, Siggi retracts nothing substantive that is alleged in the indictment, so this drama is instead a demand that you accept the word of a liar rather than read the documents to show that the liar’s claims are irrelevant to the charges against Assange.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2021/06/27/wikileaks-and-edward-snowden-champion-sociopathic-liars-and-sloppy-thinking/ https://www.emptywheel.net/2021/06/27/wikileaks-and-edward-s...
(I really don't know anything about the case so I don't have an opinion, other than to be reflexively skeptical of sweeping claims of conspiracy)
- the_optimist 5y agoThis analysis fails to make the case that having a witness recant is irrelevant. It is also full of nonsense hyperbole, as though it were written by a very passionate person who does not command faculties of reasoning.