You cringe, as you should. But when you say empty-headed things like, “Stories like this have me worried the vaccines aren't as effective as I once believe”, n

You cringe, as you should. But when you say empty-headed things like, “Stories like this have me worried the vaccines aren't as effective as I once believe”, now I cringe. It’s a clickbait science website pandering to people who like anecdotes. It should have zero bearing on your opinions of vaccine efficacy. I understand. Your opinions probably didn’t change and you were shooting for a dramatic effect. You just don’t like being manipulated with anecdotes, so you’ll respond in kind by manipulating people by playing the role of the person who is inversely influenced by anecdotes. So which is it? Are you an empty-headed ninny who’s aware of anecdotes but is still inversely influenced by them?Or just another manipulative person playing a role? BTW - I down voted the story.