3 ms·
I don't think so because in their 2019 diversity report they have breakdowns of Asian+, Black+, Latinx+, Native American+ and White+ in an "Intersectional workf
by bko 5y ago
I don't think so because in their 2019 diversity report they have breakdowns of Asian+, Black+, Latinx+, Native American+ and White+ in an "Intersectional workforce" chart. I think that has to do with gender and sexuality, so those shouldn't be +
Their hires and workforce representation are ~40% Asian+ but I don't think that qualifies as diversity.
https://kstatic.googleusercontent.com/files/93d9a4094693cb783535e7baa3f596bccb1ce697dccec2e4db2114b84013ae12a1399ec9672fe1ab2fd419ac0ca9a3b6d2f78418b480885e7b24c9ec107c0ccc https://kstatic.googleusercontent.com/files/93d9a4094693cb78...
- kbelder 5y agoIt also has the effect of pushing as many people into the +buckets as possible, making it so all marginal cases are included. This could be a modern incarnation of the 'one drop' rule, thinking that if you're part minority, that is still the most important part of your makeup. Or, more likely, it's to inflate numbers as much as possible for PR.