5 ms·
I suspect this bit didn't endear them to the FCC either: HobbyKing had told the FCC that it had no notice of the Commission’s authorization requirements; that
by quercusa 5y ago
I suspect this bit didn't endear them to the FCC either:
HobbyKing had told the FCC that it had no notice of the Commission’s authorization requirements; that the Fifth Amendment relieved HobbyKing of its duty to respond; that the forfeiture amount was inappropriate because its parent company, Indubitably, Inc., lacked the ability to pay to the Forfeiture Order; and that the Commission was time-barred from taking action against ABC Fulfillment Services LLC because it was not part of HobbyKing’s business.
- pydry 5y agoOuch. Either they had a terrible lawyer or demanded the lawyer they did have make the impossible happen.
- MertsA 5y agoIt's like I'm reading "Sovereign Citizen: Corporate Edition". Why did someone honestly think there was even the slightest chance of that response helping their situation? "We weren't importing, we were travelling!"