I watched an interview with her on YouTube and she had a very argumentative tone when questioned by an audience member, rather than a conversational and educati

I watched an interview with her on YouTube and she had a very argumentative tone when questioned by an audience member, rather than a conversational and educational one. Not surprised to hear from a fellow expert that her theories aren't really supported by evidence. She seemed extremely defensive during the Q&A. Here's the video: https://youtu.be/qwsft6tmvBA https://youtu.be/qwsft6tmvBA In fact the audience member I linked to basically accidentally stepped on a landmine which seems to be the main critique you've posted of her work, just by talking about facts that seem evident (that emotions are the result of chemicals flooding the brain)