4 ms·
This is an interesting comment because I generally agree with your arguments (e.g. that electric is better, so what's the point limiting them), but you draw a d
by lucb1e 5y ago
This is an interesting comment because I generally agree with your arguments (e.g. that electric is better, so what's the point limiting them), but you draw a different conclusion, namely that there should simply not be a limit, while also not saying that there should be a limit for combustion engines even though you just argued against those.
- freemint 5y ago(Battery) Electric is not just "better" and then personal car use of intercity travel is ok. If Electric cars only need to be build to reach 130 Km/h they can be made more efficient and cheaper (allowing for earlier and larger adoption). Cars that want to be faster and need quadratically more energy with speed need to be heavier, need more Lithium.
- lucb1e 5y agoThat still sounds better than constant GHG emissions to me, even if it's not perfect. If you have numbers that show differently (perhaps the cut-off point as you scale up from electric bike to airplane lies right at large or fast cars?) I'd be happy to learn that I'm wrong, though.