I don't agree with the idea that climate change science is shaky, but this is a bad line of argument to go down. Here's an example of why it's a bad line to go

I don't agree with the idea that climate change science is shaky, but this is a bad line of argument to go down. Here's an example of why it's a bad line to go down: > There's no conclusive evidence God exists or not, so why not choose the side that is more likely to save your soul?