Utterly incompetent article, basing all its conclusions on this poll question: “Suppose a proposal was on the ballot next year to add a monthly fee to consumer

Utterly incompetent article, basing all its conclusions on this poll question: “Suppose a proposal was on the ballot next year to add a monthly fee to consumers’ monthly electricity bill to combat climate change. If this proposal passes, it would cost your household $10 every month.” It then assumes that voting against the proposal indicates an unwillingness to pay for climate change. This completely misses the obvious - which is that a $10 monthly fee will not solve climate change and so people are right to vote against the proposal. Indeed it would be ridiculous for people to vote for such a proposal.