Oh give me a break this is the lamest excuse for trashing the 1st amendment I've ever heard. If you have government officials bringing executives and having he

Oh give me a break this is the lamest excuse for trashing the 1st amendment I've ever heard. If you have government officials bringing executives and having hearings asking Zuckerberg when they're going to do something about removing speech they find offensive your first amendment is basically gone. Do you think they just invite him in to hear what he has to say? It's all an intimidation tactic to elicit coercion from these companies so they can use these platforms to push their agenda and silence anything else while guaranteeing funding. >Anyone that believes in the first amendment should be very against governments being able to determine content on private platforms. Wow? gaslight much? This would have done the opposite by disallowing the platforms to allow you only to see specific things. I don't know what to tell you if you're so confused that you think blocking specific speech is more supportive of the 1st amendment. >This is not a political party issue, its a constitutional one. I don't even know what you mean by that. There's one party pushing de-platforming and removal right now.