7 ms·
too little, too late! I am super happy with React+Js nowadays..
by FabianCarbonara 5y ago
too little, too late! I am super happy with React+Js nowadays..
- neatze 5y agoInteresting to see how much slower is JS when compared to Fortran for matrix operations, no idea how to compare React to Fortran.
- FabianCarbonara 5y agoto be honest, this was just a very stupid joke. i guess there is no good reason to compare the two.
- SavantIdiot 5y agoReact is a responsive framework, not a compute lib. It's a joke. Getting offtopic here from FORTRAN, but there have been several attempts at numeric libraries in javascript (math.js, numjs), they are either lightweight, or unmaintained and in a sorry state, or require async execution that expect remote hardware (Googles tensor libs) which makes them a bit difficult to use in a general setting. Hopefully WebASM will result in a native numpy-like library for JS because numpy is a very well-thought-out library and interface, it's really addictive.
- walshemj 5y agoI have written interfaces in Fortran 77 back in the 80's
- jazzyjackson 5y agoIt’s not fast but I’ve found “algebrite” to be a good CAS for JavaScript that I can break out anytime I need dot products.
- erhk 5y agoIm quite happy with my new apartment and also will not be needing fortran
- wumpus 5y agoI just moved to the apartment upstairs because it has a familiar floor-plan, is renovated, and has a slightly better view.
- cpach 5y agoOk cool but is React+Js really a competitor to Fortran…?
- lkuty 5y agoBoth are Turing complete, so it is the case
- cheeze 5y agoI prefer Excel to both, which is also Turing complete.
- henvic 5y agoWhat about CSS?
- SiempreViernes 5y agoBetter go with TeX if you're going into the Turing complete typesetting language niche, a Knuth product has more street cred.
- sellyme 5y agoI don't know why people still bother using Fortran, Magic the Gathering obsoleted it decades ago.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]