Yeah, that is the strategy advised by Berman. The argument if stated formally would go: > Thunberg has <unfavorable characterization> > Therefore, we can igno

Yeah, that is the strategy advised by Berman. The argument if stated formally would go: > Thunberg has <unfavorable characterization> > Therefore, we can ignore climate change. More typically, it would go (e.g.): > <Environmental activist / celebrity> has taken a plane flight. > Therefore, we should ignore scientific data about climate change. [1] That is why the argument is never stated formally, of course. 1: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9006353/emma-thompson-gas-guzzling-flight-extinction-rebellion/ https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9006353/emma-thompson-gas-guzz...