3 ms·
Which should be done anyway. YouTube dropped the ball on that one.
by FridayoLeary 5y ago
Which should be done anyway. YouTube dropped the ball on that one.
- sksksk 5y agoYouTube used to select the preview image by taking a freeze frame at a certain point in the video. Older YouTubers used to manipulate this by putting the suggestive part of the video at the right time. Here's a blast from the past doing just that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8tXjJL3xcM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8tXjJL3xcM
- csunbird 5y agoI am also not sure why they allow thumbnails outside of the video content anyways.
- lucideer 5y agoI think largely because not allowing it doesn't make that much of a difference; I can just as easily place a click-baity frame within my actual video and use that as the thumb.
- jperry 5y agoBecause it's great for analytics. The formula of "face in thumbnail, big text, bold colours" works and YouTube WANT you to be clickbaited so that you watch the ads.
- blackbrokkoli 5y agoBecause otherwise people would just put a 1-frame endcard in their video with whatever they want to have as a thumbnail? And if the thumbnail is picked randomly, you are just rewarding videos that show dramatic content with text overlay at all times. And the best-researched Tom Scott video might get randomly punished because the thumbnail is a brown-grey blur in the middle of a transition. The existence of the medium "thumbnail" is not more of a problem than the existence of book cover. Breeding a healthy culture of what should be on it is the problem we should focus on, both by audience behavior and suggestion algorithm.