2 ms·
Let's say court ruled Person X stole ThingA from Person Y. Let's also say court ruled that Person Y also stole from Person X, they stole ThingB -> You are stop
by blinkingled 15y ago
Let's say court ruled Person X stole ThingA from Person Y.
Let's also say court ruled that Person Y also stole from Person X, they stole ThingB -> You are stopping here - uh oh bad news for Person Y.
We don't know what ThingA values vs. ThingB - You are still saying it's net bad news for Person Y without seeing the full picture - it might not be bad for anyone if it all cancels out for the most part.
So yes patent infringement is bad for the party doing it - only if the party claiming the infringement does not also infringe on their patents. In this case Apple infringes S3 patents.
- Steko 15y agoYou're trying to take last month's news and net it out with todays news. This is absurd. Let's take is as a given that Person Y stole something from Person X and was found guilty of that last month. Now there's a question about whether Person X also stole something from Person Y. If the judge today rules for Person X that is bad news for X. If the judge rules for Person Y that is bad news for Y. It's that simple. If the Cavs beat the Mavricks in game 1, losing Game 2 is bad news for them because they would have been up 2-0 instead of tied 1-1.