Thanks for replying. I thought that might be your reasoning. Without agreeing or disagreeing with your rationale, for me it would be better if you'd make this

Thanks for replying. I thought that might be your reasoning. Without agreeing or disagreeing with your rationale, for me it would be better if you'd make this more clear from the outset. Something like: individuals can only make very limited positive impact, which in many instances is confounded by psychological factors driving behaviour in the wrong direction. Your understanding is better than your initial communication. There are in fact aspects of your argument that I disagree with concerning the Overton Window, but we needn't go there for now. At least you are no longer infuriating to me.