3 ms·
> you will destroy one of the last remaining well-paying job market in the long term. Speaking of the long term, it's not hard to imagine it is doomed no matte
by namelosw 5y ago
> you will destroy one of the last remaining well-paying job market in the long term.
Speaking of the long term, it's not hard to imagine it is doomed no matter what individuals choose.
SV exists because there was no efficient way to collaborate remotely. WFH still sucks today, but is much better than before. There are countless startups are trying to fix this, therefore it will get better gradually. Eventually, SV won't make sense anymore other than a cultural symbol, because the high-quality and cheaper talents reserve is all around the world.
Companies will take advantage of things when they see fit, and that does not depends too much on the choice of individuals. The question left is when will it happen rather than will or will not.
- cudgy 5y ago“There are countless startups are trying to fix this, therefore it will get better gradually.” Better how? By making WFH more like working in an office?
- namelosw 5y agoIt could be, since it might give the employer some subjective confidence. Though I'm not a big fan of the idea... But it seems like an Okayish idea for the transition period. Many people are trying to tackle this, so their approaches and values provided should be pretty diversed. There are also possibilities that people came up with something really "remote native".