3 ms·
My understanding is that this is basically the endgame of all patents related to computing. You want to patent something so vague and poorly defined that it can
by sidewndr46 5y ago
My understanding is that this is basically the endgame of all patents related to computing. You want to patent something so vague and poorly defined that it can be used to make a claim against anything.
- tsimionescu 5y agoYes, that is very common for patents, but is not the case here. The patent and even lawsuit are very explicit that the "invention" works with both static and dynamic RAM. There is no point where they claim that dynamic RAM is better or some novel part of their invention. They are instead excluding the need for things like ROM.