3 ms·
I think you are right about the refusal, though it might be nice if the Supreme Court could just outright say as much "We don't want to hear this now, argue in
by artful-hacker 5y ago
I think you are right about the refusal, though it might be nice if the Supreme Court could just outright say as much "We don't want to hear this now, argue in lower courts first"
Though I must say, what is strange to me about this refusal though, is that it is a case between states. How can the Supreme Court refuse to hear a case between two states? What other court is there to go to?
- rossdavidh 5y agoApparently two of the nine justices agree with you. However, since it might take them as long to rule on it as there is time left before the MA policy expires, there is an extra reason for them to ignore this one.