>planning is part of the model Even if it was (which I doubt, except implicitly, which is not the same thing), there can be no planning without a goal. It's a

>planning is part of the model Even if it was (which I doubt, except implicitly, which is not the same thing), there can be no planning without a goal. It's a kind of mirrored Chinese Room fallacy: In that case, the complaint is that the performance of the system cannot be ascribed to any distinct part of the whole, concluding that the whole cannot perform. In this case, the performance of the system is falsely ascribed to one distinct part, ignoring the contribution of the other.