So here's an interesting problem. To have a big disinformation effect, you need to influence many people in a strong way. To stay undetected, you need to keep

So here's an interesting problem. To have a big disinformation effect, you need to influence many people in a strong way. To stay undetected, you need to keep it small and soft, reaching few people with low intensity. If you want to use amplification to convince a core group of spreaders, you need to be authentic (which, as the article shows, isn't easy because of language, culture, personal contact etc.) It seems that the only remaining option is to convince people of obvious but harmful opinions which they unconsciously held before?