I’m afraid this demonstrates how ad-hoc the definition of net neutrality is. No packets are being blocked; none are being slowed down. The ISP is not charging a

I’m afraid this demonstrates how ad-hoc the definition of net neutrality is. No packets are being blocked; none are being slowed down. The ISP is not charging any content provider a special rate. (If having the content “homed” on the ISP’s network is a problem, then any CDN would be a problem.) I am not saying that the ISP isn’t taking advantage for their own benefit. I am not saying it’s not shady. I am saying that the behavior is not a violation of any previous technical definition of neutrality – maybe the “spirit” of it, but technologists don’t believe in spirits, one hopes.