It’s of course possible that “test data” was an excuse they made up after the fact. Maybe it’s a cover story to hide even worse incompetence (or maliciousness).

It’s of course possible that “test data” was an excuse they made up after the fact. Maybe it’s a cover story to hide even worse incompetence (or maliciousness). Why did it require a candidate to notice that the sums between rounds were wildly different? And wtf is a test ballot anyway? Are these physical ballots, or entries in the database? Neither inspires confidence in the integrity of this election.