5 ms·

Our HR just checks if they completed the application correctly, i.e, included a CV and (if requested a covering letter). If they fail this bit they don't get to

Our HR just checks if they completed the application correctly, i.e, included a CV and (if requested a covering letter). If they fail this bit they don't get to the sift. The sift of CVs/resumes (to whittle down for interview) is done by developers and so are the interviews.

aj3 5y ago
This sounds like an amazing hiring process. Hopefully it becomes more common.
- fridif 5y ago
  A CV should not be necessary Edit: My apologies everyone. I actually read this as "cover letter" instead of CV. I agree a resume (as noted below) should be required, but CV (academic style) is probably a US term not applicable here. Sorry!
  - celticninja 5y ago
    How else can i whittle down 30 applicants to 5 or 6 to invite to interview? edit: saw another response which said a cv was a resume, this is correct. In the UK we use Curriculum Vitae (CV) instead of resume. They are the same thing. Not sure what you may have thought a CV was, however I would be interested to know.
    - muffinman26 5y ago
      In the US a CV is a comprehensive list of all previous work in the field, while a resume includes only the most recent/relevant experience. The term is primarily used for academic positions, where it includes a listing of all publications.
  - ajford 5y ago
    They could be meaning a resume as used in the US. Outside of the US (or at least in a number of European countries) what is called a resume in the US is referred to as a CV (though my understanding is that it's generally a few pages long, not a single page). Though this comes not from first-hand experience, but a lot of in-depth conversations with friends/coworkers from overseas, so I might be wrong here.
jbay808 5y ago
Our HR was like this too! They were amazing. They sent a spreadsheet with each applicant in it, greyed out the ones who didn't follow instructions, and bolded the ones that they thought I should read first based on how close their applications were. I read all of them, even the greyed out ones, until I'd read enough to trust that the HR team's filter was well-calibrated, and I also let the HR team know when they got it right/wrong so they could improve their filtering process. Overall it worked great but I understand that such functional HR teams are the exception, not the rule.

aj3 5y ago

This sounds like an amazing hiring process. Hopefully it becomes more common.

fridif 5y ago
A CV should not be necessary Edit: My apologies everyone. I actually read this as "cover letter" instead of CV. I agree a resume (as noted below) should be required, but CV (academic style) is probably a US term not applicable here. Sorry!
- celticninja 5y ago
  How else can i whittle down 30 applicants to 5 or 6 to invite to interview? edit: saw another response which said a cv was a resume, this is correct. In the UK we use Curriculum Vitae (CV) instead of resume. They are the same thing. Not sure what you may have thought a CV was, however I would be interested to know.
  - muffinman26 5y ago
    In the US a CV is a comprehensive list of all previous work in the field, while a resume includes only the most recent/relevant experience. The term is primarily used for academic positions, where it includes a listing of all publications.
- ajford 5y ago
  They could be meaning a resume as used in the US. Outside of the US (or at least in a number of European countries) what is called a resume in the US is referred to as a CV (though my understanding is that it's generally a few pages long, not a single page). Though this comes not from first-hand experience, but a lot of in-depth conversations with friends/coworkers from overseas, so I might be wrong here.

jbay808 5y ago

Our HR was like this too! They were amazing. They sent a spreadsheet with each applicant in it, greyed out the ones who didn't follow instructions, and bolded the ones that they thought I should read first based on how close their applications were. I read all of them, even the greyed out ones, until I'd read enough to trust that the HR team's filter was well-calibrated, and I also let the HR team know when they got it right/wrong so they could improve their filtering process. Overall it worked great but I understand that such functional HR teams are the exception, not the rule.