5 ms·
The ideal situation would be to run the fibres (or maybe just ducts) centrally and allow different ISPs to run their own equipment. Makes perfect sense for the
by iso1631 5y ago
The ideal situation would be to run the fibres (or maybe just ducts) centrally and allow different ISPs to run their own equipment.
Makes perfect sense for the last mile to be run by the government, just like the last mile of roads are.
Then you can have choice of ISPs. Or run your own.
if you want to an ISP which gives you a real IPv4 address, a guarenteed service and known contention ratio -- say they buy a couple of 10G lines from two diverse upstream providers like HE or Tata to a central location, land on a 52 port switch, and use it to serve their customers with 400mbit each way guaranteed and upto 10G if there's capacity.
On the other hand if you just want basic broadband with contention meaning that you could run into problems if everyone is pulling 50mbit, even though you can burst upto 1G, and perhaps you have CGNAT, you'll be paying less for it (the 10G uplink is spread out over more people), but that's your choice
This empowers the customer and ensures competition in the market, while the basic costs of fibre from a central internet exchange point are borne by either taxes or access charges (if you use the circuit you pay $5/month)
- fgonzag 5y agoThis is the correct idea. It maximizes competition while minimizing barrier to entry. Micro IPSs become extremely affordable, and all you have to do is have each ISP pay a set fee for each customer for line maintenance and expansion.