I don't think that's a sensible claim at all. "Proof that humans are not artificial intelligences" doesn't even seem to be a coherent idea. I'm going to go ahe

I don't think that's a sensible claim at all. "Proof that humans are not artificial intelligences" doesn't even seem to be a coherent idea. I'm going to go ahead and assume you've misunderstood what this person was talking about, as the alternative is to say that you're sitting on proof of the impossibility of a very quickly moving field with extremely deep implications for the future of humanity, and I've never once heard of it. Unless you'd like to explain it :)