> I don't see why it's morally more just for a mom and pop shop to abuse workers than it is for a big corporation. You are of course right, and we don't want

> I don't see why it's morally more just for a mom and pop shop to abuse workers than it is for a big corporation. You are of course right, and we don't want abuse at either scale. I think GP is also relying on mom and pop shops not having enough economic power to abuse workers at that level. A local business usually can't afford burning through workers like cigarettes, it would go out of business at the 3rd contractor (and hopefully these 3 people can take legal action without a barrage of lawyers sucking their life savings). Amazon can afford to burn through thousands without seeing any clear impact on its bottomline. That's where rules should be stricter IMO.