4 ms·
If it is done in the open, it is by definition not a conspiracy.
by noslenwerdna 5y ago
If it is done in the open, it is by definition not a conspiracy.
- lukifer 5y agoYou’ve never heard of an “open secret”?
- encryptluks2 5y agoThe conspiracy film by Gabe "lawsuit" Hoffman? I think it was more of a projectionary film. That guy is a creep.
- boomboomsubban 5y agoThe act itself can be open but the true motive secret. Snowden's example of gerrymandering shows what he means, it's a practice ostensibly to balance voting districts but there is clearly a conspiracy to use it for political gain.
- cat199 5y agobut is it not 'conspiring' ? it's not a 'secret conspiracy' sure, but it is a 'product of conspiring'; and x-acy is a linguistic construct for expressing 'product of x'
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- harryf 5y agoDefine “in the open”. Through lens of (social) media and through our own cognitive biases the idea of anything being done “in the open” seems more like self delusion.