3 ms·
You clearly didn't read or intentionally ignored all my previous comments. I stated: > I have left leaning friends there who run businesses and it's very well
by busymom0 5y ago
You clearly didn't read or intentionally ignored all my previous comments. I stated:
> I have left leaning friends there who run businesses and it's very well reported even by them.
CA has been the state which has lost population because people are fleeing the state and one of the reasons is "Filth":
https://travelmedium.com/usa/california/why-are-people-leaving-california https://travelmedium.com/usa/california/why-are-people-leavi...
I also stated I am very pro legalizing all drugs. I think you are being insincere on purpose because despite me presenting multiple left leaning articles which go against your narrative, you prefer to have blinders on. This discussion isn't worth going forward.
- tayo42 5y agoYour muddying up the points, none of those issues are related to drug use. California has a lot of homeless people, a lot of those use drugs. Californias homeless problem is complicated and completely separate from drug use. Now your quoting articles about california as a whole. What your saying and the conclusions your drawing make no sense. Your also showing a misunderstanding of the nuances of san fransisco. Your own articles show that these problems are concentrated in historically problematic neighborhoods. Go back to the original quote i picked from you, it shows a complete lack of understanding of what is going on, and you cant form a coherent argument. Show me one article that says, sunset, richmond, bernal heights, glen park, excelsior, pacific heights, presidio, noe valley, balboa park are full of needles.
- busymom0 5y ago> and you cant form a coherent argument Your inability to make ad hominem attacks prevents me from replying further. Have a good day.