4 ms·
so its not open source anymore then say confluence, who lets you download the source if you have a license to it? false claims like this will ensure I never us
by philderbeast 5y ago
so its not open source anymore then say confluence, who lets you download the source if you have a license to it?
false claims like this will ensure I never use or recommend this product
- mimixco 5y agoWiki.js is currently available under AGPL and that is one of the ways code that uses it can be compliant. It is not our intent to mislead. It is certainly true that other open source companies like Red Hat provide source code for their licensed products only to licensees. Here is the section from the Wiki.js license (again, not ours): d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no further charge. In this case, we are offering access to the object code for a charge and anyone who licenses it can have the corresponding source code at no additional charge. This is straight-up AGPL. Wiki.js is the only product we offer with AGPL source and the only one licensed this way. Our other products are Blue Oak which is entirely permissive. We offer those products for self-installation from GitHub repos with the full source.
- philderbeast 5y agoso your product is not 100% open source as you claim? how is that not misleading? if YOUR license is not open source, you need to remove this claim from your website.
- mimixco 5y agoOur software is all open source. For Blue Oak stuff, you can download our source on GitHub. For AGPL-modified products, we provide the source to customers on request, per the AGPL license.