4 ms·

Yes, it's public source code.

• haimez 5y ago
  Public doesn’t mean it’s not encumbered by copyrights
  • ggreer 5y ago
    Pretty much everything is trained on copyrighted content: machine translation software, TWDNE, DALL-E, and all the GPTs. Software people are bringing this up now because it's their ox being gored. It's the same as when furries got upset about This Fursona Does Not Exist.[1][2] 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23093911 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23093911 2. https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/gfam2y/furries_creator_of_this_fursona_does_not_exist/ https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/gfam2y/furries_...
    • tremon 5y ago
      To expand on your argument, pretty much every person is trained on copyrighted content too. Doesn't make their generated content automatically subject to copyright either.
    • user-the-name 5y ago
      This is an argument for why this is a bigger problem, not a smaller one.
    • malka 5y ago
      yeah, except that Oracle and google have way more lawyer power than furries artists.
      • ganzuul 5y ago
        You have no idea how much money they make. Some of them have payment plans for commissions.
  • oalae5niMiel7qu 5y ago
    If it's BSD-licensed, the encumbrance doesn't matter much.