You're trying to talk about consequences of my statement, which I'm trying very hard not to talk about, because I don't care. I'm only talking about this very s

You're trying to talk about consequences of my statement, which I'm trying very hard not to talk about, because I don't care. I'm only talking about this very specific instance. > Again, that is a disclosure timeline. Not a demand for a fix in that timeline. Yes and it is based on the expectation of a fix within that timeline being practical. > You're trying to convert it to a demand for a fix no matter what. That is not productive. No I'm not, you're trying to say that I am, repeatedly, and I keep telling you I don't care about discussing disclosure policy broadly. I'm only talking about this once instance. > It seems like a much stronger approach than the "lol PZ hypocricy" option. Take that up with the person who posted about P0 initially. I'm only saying that it's ironic and that I support the 90 day window as being a very reasonable time to fix things, and that them going 3x over is a bad look.