4 ms·
In the first example above, you have one place where you have position based binding that you could break while reusing or refactoring. In your example, you ha
by encoderer 15y ago
In the first example above, you have one place where you have position based binding that you could break while reusing or refactoring.
In your example, you have one place where you have position based binding that you could break while reusing or refactoring.
- eropple 15y agoIn my experience, people are vastly less likely to rename a variable than move it to a different place in a query. There's also the proclivity for people to want to reuse the same value in multiple places in a query. Name-based binding makes that a lot more readable and straightforward.