4 ms·

Even if true, this novel molecule is not floating around in a body for an entire year waiting to have some side effect. They've been shooting it into people for

by mrj 5y ago

Even if true, this novel molecule is not floating around in a body for an entire year waiting to have some side effect. They've been shooting it into people for a year and a half now. If there was something to worry about, it would have been seen. But there are many parts of this vaccine that is shared with previous ones and the mechanics have been tested thoroughly. The science is the same. There's just no credible reason for those with normal immune systems to delay. "This can't have happened for this yet. The trials are still underway. Unknown risk." That's just simply untrue. The trials completed. Read the link.

incrudible 5y ago
> Even if true, this novel molecule is not floating around in a body for an entire year waiting to have some side effect. They've been shooting it into people for a year and a half now. If there was something to worry about, it would have been seen. There are lots of things we do see and we should worry about. The problem is that we can't tell right away if it's just noise, if it's a potentially rare side-effect. Then you have the problems like Myocarditis, which are clearly caused by the vaccine, which we hand-wave away with speculative "the benefits still outweigh the risk" scenarios: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Screen-Shot-2021-06-24-at-5.09.01-PM.png https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Scree...
- mrj 5y ago
  Right, anything not yet discovered is going to be a pretty rare side effect. We're still learning about what covid does to the body, tell me about the side effects of getting sick.
- baq 5y ago
  > "the benefits still outweigh the risk" this is not handwaving, this is the foundation stone of modern medicine.
  - incrudible 5y ago
    Placebo-controlled studies that verify that the benefits actually outweigh the risk can be counted into those foundations. Speculative scenarios based on predictive factors that you could just fudge until the result looks "right" to you, those are the essentially quackery.
    - baq 5y ago
      no disagreement here, but the same standards should be applied to misinformation from vaccine-skeptical folks. 'we don't know' is an honest answer for both sides.
sjwalter 5y ago
Not sure why everyone keeps saying the trials completed, or which link you mean, because we can go right to the primary source (clinicaltrials.gov) and see that all the vaccines are still in Phase 3 of FDA trials. Here are the links. Please stop spreading misinformation during a deadly pandemic. Moderna's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427 Estimated Study Completion Date: October 27, 2022 Pfizer's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728 Estimated Study Completion Date: May 2, 2023 JnJ's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722 Estimated Study Completion Date: January 2, 2023
- mrj 5y ago
  You're spreading doubt about vaccines during a pandemic. Please stop.
  - sjwalter 5y ago
    One of the foundational, bedrock principles of bioethics is "informed consent". It is extremely, practically diabolically, unethical to lie to people about medical treatments prior to gaining their consent. This is literally bioethics 101. You are saying that I am putting people, or society, at risk simply by stating the simple, 100% true fact that these vaccines are not through FDA Phase 3 trials. The implication of this is you believe it is best if people are NOT given informed consent, that they are kept in the dark, and told lies about the status of these vaccines, because doing so will encourage more people to take them. I'm sorry, man, but that is just awful, terrible stuff. Coursera has a course on bioethics, you may want to inform yourself before you engage in discussions about medicine, because you are totally operating in an evil way.
    - mrj 5y ago
      I'm not arguing against consent, of course. The data is out there but you are misinterpreting it. I just think you're taking issue with silly things, overblowing the risks and trying to make other people scared. That's seriously messed up. Be truthful. You've decided not to take it no matter what. Now you're back-filling reasons not to. If you truly were about your ethics, you'd stop trying to make others afraid because you are.

by mrj 5y ago

incrudible 5y ago

> Even if true, this novel molecule is not floating around in a body for an entire year waiting to have some side effect. They've been shooting it into people for a year and a half now. If there was something to worry about, it would have been seen. There are lots of things we do see and we should worry about. The problem is that we can't tell right away if it's just noise, if it's a potentially rare side-effect. Then you have the problems like Myocarditis, which are clearly caused by the vaccine, which we hand-wave away with speculative "the benefits still outweigh the risk" scenarios: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Screen-Shot-2021-06-24-at-5.09.01-PM.png https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Scree...

mrj 5y ago
Right, anything not yet discovered is going to be a pretty rare side effect. We're still learning about what covid does to the body, tell me about the side effects of getting sick.
baq 5y ago
> "the benefits still outweigh the risk" this is not handwaving, this is the foundation stone of modern medicine.
- incrudible 5y ago
  Placebo-controlled studies that verify that the benefits actually outweigh the risk can be counted into those foundations. Speculative scenarios based on predictive factors that you could just fudge until the result looks "right" to you, those are the essentially quackery.
  - baq 5y ago
    no disagreement here, but the same standards should be applied to misinformation from vaccine-skeptical folks. 'we don't know' is an honest answer for both sides.

sjwalter 5y ago

Not sure why everyone keeps saying the trials completed, or which link you mean, because we can go right to the primary source (clinicaltrials.gov) and see that all the vaccines are still in Phase 3 of FDA trials. Here are the links. Please stop spreading misinformation during a deadly pandemic. Moderna's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427 Estimated Study Completion Date: October 27, 2022 Pfizer's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728 Estimated Study Completion Date: May 2, 2023 JnJ's FDA trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722 Estimated Study Completion Date: January 2, 2023

mrj 5y ago
You're spreading doubt about vaccines during a pandemic. Please stop.
- sjwalter 5y ago
  One of the foundational, bedrock principles of bioethics is "informed consent". It is extremely, practically diabolically, unethical to lie to people about medical treatments prior to gaining their consent. This is literally bioethics 101. You are saying that I am putting people, or society, at risk simply by stating the simple, 100% true fact that these vaccines are not through FDA Phase 3 trials. The implication of this is you believe it is best if people are NOT given informed consent, that they are kept in the dark, and told lies about the status of these vaccines, because doing so will encourage more people to take them. I'm sorry, man, but that is just awful, terrible stuff. Coursera has a course on bioethics, you may want to inform yourself before you engage in discussions about medicine, because you are totally operating in an evil way.
  - mrj 5y ago
    I'm not arguing against consent, of course. The data is out there but you are misinterpreting it. I just think you're taking issue with silly things, overblowing the risks and trying to make other people scared. That's seriously messed up. Be truthful. You've decided not to take it no matter what. Now you're back-filling reasons not to. If you truly were about your ethics, you'd stop trying to make others afraid because you are.