I'm sorry if I'm derailing the discussion here but "copilot" really is a much better phrase to use for assisting software than "autopilot". If more companies wo

I'm sorry if I'm derailing the discussion here but "copilot" really is a much better phrase to use for assisting software than "autopilot". If more companies would choose phrases like these that accurately emphasize that the human is not being replaced but assisted (no names mentioned) I think it would benefit everyone in terms of clarity. Sure, you might say "it's all marketing and if AP exists nobody would buy CP", but I don't think it's that simple. Customers understand when their expectations are being met, exceeded, or let down.