2 ms·
The article was advocating for something more back and forth, like a chatroom or forum, rather than a newsfeed. With Google+ just starting out (even at 10m use
by Xlythe 15y ago
The article was advocating for something more back and forth, like a chatroom or forum, rather than a newsfeed.
With Google+ just starting out (even at 10m users), there's already a feeling of exclusivity and community. Groups would definitely help keep that feeling going as Google+ goes public, though, as long as it's implemented right. With public circles, groups, tags, etc being advocated, I hope the simplicity of Google+ isn't lost.
- Duff 15y agoI hope so too. Google has a poor track record at getting group-stuff right. Google Groups being a great example. That said, I'm liking Google+ so far. The circle model lets you operate in a way that is similar to real life, unlike Facebook. IMO, wall posts are about 75% of Facebook, and Google+ is already superior to what they are doing.