3 ms·
While technically correct, this doesn't square with most people's intuitive sense of what "being a millionaire" means. It's not having a solid retirement nest e
by hatchnyc 5y ago
While technically correct, this doesn't square with most people's intuitive sense of what "being a millionaire" means. It's not having a solid retirement nest egg, it is being able to jet off to your yacht in St. Tropez on a private jet.
I think this is largely due to inflation. A million dollars in the 50s or 60s would be around 10 million today, while at the turn of the 20th century when the term really became popular it would be worth 30 million today. A "millionaire" of the time is really living a different lifestyle and can likely afford a very extravagant upper class lifestyle purely on interest of their wealth.
With housing costs having risen so much faster still beyond inflation, today you can easily be "a millionaire" simply by having a bit of equity in a modest home in a costal city.
- denimnerd42 5y agoyeah well that's true about people's intuition but it hasn't been the case for a long time. to "jet off on a private jet" anywhere regularly probably requires a salary on the order of a million per year.
- closeparen 5y agoBut most people's intuitive sense of "being a millionaire" informs how they think about tax policy...
- Matticus_Rex 5y agoWho thinks being a millionaire means a yacht and a jet, other than children?
- hatchnyc 5y agoWell a Google Image search for "millionaire" turns up mostly private jets and Lamborghinis.
- Matticus_Rex 5y agoRight, but who believes that stock photos generally represent their keywords?