3 ms·
The article asks a moral question, which to me is no different than asking "Is murder actually fine?" If you go down the rabbit hole deep enough, the natural o
by lucasyvas 5y ago
The article asks a moral question, which to me is no different than asking "Is murder actually fine?"
If you go down the rabbit hole deep enough, the natural order has no rules - no laws.
So, asking this question is ridiculous. Yes, the taboos do make sense. For one, the animal doesn't want it. Also, it's probably a source of disease. Finally, what's wrong with you?
- FooBarBizBazz 5y ago> For one, the animal doesn't want it. But sometimes they do. There've been dogs -- you think you've befriended the creature, then it gets the wrong idea, then you push it off, and you try to remain friendly, but that doesn't work exactly, because it gets all weird, exactly as though it's been spurned. Which I guess it has. "Sorry, you're just not my type." I've accidentally done this to humans, too. Though, look at it: If you were stuck inside a house all day with no friends and no opportunity to find a mate, you might get desperate too. I'm talking about the lonely dog. But I suppose these coronavirus lockdowns have put people in a similar situation. I wonder how much more of this kind of unspeakable thing has gone on in the last year? Norms strongly influence what people admit to. Remember when everyone was straight? > it's probably a source of disease Since when has that been an acceptable argument against sexual expression, outside of the far-right?