Damn, he says [1]: > Sorry to be blunt, but the current approach really is a terrible one. That is blunt, and would require my utmost restraint to avoid falli

Damn, he says [1]: > Sorry to be blunt, but the current approach really is a terrible one. That is blunt, and would require my utmost restraint to avoid falling into the trap of getting overly defensive if I were the proposal authors. Which is a shame, because he makes a good point. That said, it is also reassuring to see that they did actually consider his point, and I can follow their motivation [2]. I'm not sure whether I'd have made the same decision, but it's certainly a valid one to make. [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1454 https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1454 [2] https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/docs/calendar-review#why-are-calendars-a-higher-priority-for-ecmascript-vs-other-platforms https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/docs/calendar-review#why-a...