3 ms·
My intention was that a single branch could have an unambiguous revno. As pointed out elsewhere in the thread, that requires that branch identity is maintained
by jbert 15y ago
My intention was that a single branch could have an unambiguous revno.
As pointed out elsewhere in the thread, that requires that branch identity is maintained across a fork+merge, but that seems reasonable to me?
- fanf2 15y agoIn git, a branch is just a ref that points to the most recent commit in a development series. The history of the branch has no explicit link to the branch name. Individual commits do not belong to a branch. So the commits in the history of a single branch will not have unique generation numbers.