Maybe I am being simplistic, but the article’s many points basically seem to suggest that Amazon is run well while Google is not, in part because Google can aff

Maybe I am being simplistic, but the article’s many points basically seem to suggest that Amazon is run well while Google is not, in part because Google can afford to be undisciplined with its high profit margins. The person quoted even plainly says the employees produced by Amazon’s culture are better: > If I were to be hiring, I'd follow Amazon's method and hire ex-Amazonians over Google's, by a significant margin.