3 ms·
Not the amazon of today at least. I had supposed without Ad's you wouldn't have had the dotcom boom of the 90's. No dot-com boom means venture capital wouldn't
by asciimov 5y ago
Not the amazon of today at least.
I had supposed without Ad's you wouldn't have had the dotcom boom of the 90's. No dot-com boom means venture capital wouldn't have flowed as readily. Amazon still would have started, but they burned a ton of cash in the late 90's. Without burning so much capital I don't believe they would have become as huge or if they would have even survived.
I remember old amazon being cheaper than retail most of the time, they must have been eating that loss. In the end it worked out for them.