2 ms·
Even if they didn't, the rest of the world could probably peacefully agree to a hard fork in which those coins stop existing. One of the disadvantages of crypt
by dheera 5y ago
Even if they didn't, the rest of the world could probably peacefully agree to a hard fork in which those coins stop existing.
One of the disadvantages of crypto, I suppose, is that people could gang up and hard fork against any arbitrary billionaire even if they were alive.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- sneak 5y agoThat's how existing countries and currencies already work, too.
- wmf 5y agoI'm pretty sure that's less likely in crypto than in real life.
- cmelbye 5y agoWhy would anyone do that? The stolen coins would become worthless as the other 49% of the network flee to a platform that doesn't come with the risk of arbitrary theft.
- rawtxapp 5y agoIf we know anything about Bitcoin is that hardforking it doesn't work and you end up with coins that are worth a couple percentage in value compared to the original chain.
- anonporridge 5y ago> One of the disadvantages of crypto, I suppose, is that people could gang up and hard fork against any arbitrary billionaire even if they were alive. This isn't unique to crypto. People have literally been ganging up against powerful individuals since pre history. Hell, it's common in the animal world. Young male lions often gang up to oust the old alpha and take over his pride. And beyond that, our current legal system can go after any arbitrary person much more easily than it would be for the entire world to consent to hard forking to target a single individual.
- thatsabadidea 5y agoIf I say hard-fork enough, maybe I sound like I know about crypto things. You don't know what it takes to do a fork of bitcoin. Many have tried, none have succeeded.