>anticompetitive conduct that attempts to establish a harmful monopoly is also illegal I think point 3 is the relevant bit: "a dangerous probability of achievi

>anticompetitive conduct that attempts to establish a harmful monopoly is also illegal I think point 3 is the relevant bit: "a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power." It seems like the judge is basically saying that probability isn't high enough based on their market share (that the FTC couldn't even give a good number for).